MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045014952

Advanced Weather Monitoring for a Cable Stayed Bridge

2018· article· en· W7045014952 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of CincinnatiU.S. Department of Transportation
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Field (mathematics)Weather forecastingTerm (time)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the northern United States, Canada, and many northern European countries, snow and ice pose serious hazards to motorists.Potential traffic disruptions caused by ice and snow are challenges faced by transportation agencies.Successful winter maintenance involves the selection and application of the most optimum strategy, over optimum time intervals.The risk associated with operating the bridges during winter emergencies varies depending on the size of the structure, the material of the stays, volume of average daily traffic, geographical location, nature of terrain and surroundings etc.The 'Dashboard', a monitoring system designed to help the bridge maintenance and operation personnel was developed at University of Cincinnati Infrastructure Institute.This was implemented at the Veterans Glass City Skyway Bridge in Toledo, Ohio.This system was also extended to the Port Mann Bridge in Vancouver, Canada.The aim of this research is to come up with an advanced monitoring system which will help the bridge management team make control actions during winter emergencies on the VGCS and Port Mann bridges.The current monitoring system gives information on the status of ice accumulation/ snow accretion or shedding based on last one hour's weather data.This dissertation focuses on adding intelligence to the existing system through addition of sensors, identifying patterns in events, adding cost-benefit analysis and incorporating forecast parameters, while also extending the system to other bridges and structures.In essence a new, more intelligent monitor designed to make the control decisions easier and have all necessary information to make such decisions in one place will be invaluable to the officials in the transportation departments.iii

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Same topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207