MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045074700

Análisis morfométrico de los Paramphistomideos en bovinos beneficiados en el matadero San Francisco, Distrito de Salaverry – Trujillo, Perú "

2018· dissertation· en· W7045074700 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumUterusFemale Reproductive TractOvaryAbomasumHelminths
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study was carried out in the private
\nslaughterhouse of the "San Francisco" district of Salaverry, province of
\nTrujillo, La Libertad department and in the parasitology laboratories of the
\nschools of human medicine and veterinary medicine of the Private
\nUniversity Antenor Orrego during the months from January to June 2017. 
\nThe objective was to determine the incidence, morphology and histology
\nof bovine paramphistomosis. Rumen and reticulum of 300 cattle were
\ninspected, of which 6.7% (300/20) were positive. 90% of the positive
\nanimals come from the provinces of Cajamarca (20/18), 5% from Paiján
\n(20/1), and other 5% from Chao (20/1). Thirty fresh adult parasites were
\nplaced with Delafield's hematoxylin and mounted with Canada Balsam for
\ninternal morphometric examination. Fifty parasites were preserved in
\nwarm acetic formaldehyde, length, width, oral suction cup and ventral
\nsuction cup were measured using a digital vernier. It was determined that
\nthe parasite studied belongs to the family Paramphistomidae, genus
\nCalicophoron, and microbothrioid species, whose internal morphometry
\ncorresponds to esophagus (332.3 μm long by 211.5 μm wide), oral suction
\ncup (264.2 μm diameter), genital pore (86.2 μm diameter), Ovary (112.2
\nμm in diameter), anterior testis (83.6 μm x 65.0 μm), posterior testis (123.8
\nμm x 79.001 μm), uterus (437.6 μm in length) and acetabulum (115.2 μm
\ndiameter).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207