MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045076973

ACID NEUTRALIZATION AND METAL MOBILIZATION IN OIL SANDS FROTH TREATMENT TAILINGS

2024· dissertation· en· W7045076973 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsEffluentNeutralizationPyriteDissolutionOil sandsExtraction (chemistry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acid generation and metal(loid) release is an emerging closure consideration for oil sands mines in northern Alberta, Canada. Froth treatment tailings (FTT) generated during bitumen extraction generally exhibit higher sulfide-mineral contents relative to other tailings streams. Recent studies have shown that pyrite oxidation can promote pore-water acidification and metal(loid) release within the unsaturated zone of FTT beach deposits. The corresponding sequence of acid neutralization reactions and their influence on metal(loid) release has not been studied. Laboratory column experiments examined acid neutralization reactions and their influence on metal(loid) mobility in samples collected from a commercial scale FTT beach deposit. Near-surface samples were collected from non-weathered, partially weathered, and highly weathered regions of this sub-aerial deposit, which provided an opportunity to examine the influence of initial weathering extent on acid neutralization and metal(loid) release. The experiments also considered non-solvent-washed (i.e., as received) and solvent-washed sample splits to assess impacts of residual hydrocarbons on these reactions. An acidic solution (i.e., 0.05 M H2SO4; pH ~1.5) solution was continuously pumped through each column and effluent samples were regularly collected for geochemical analysis. Effluent pH decreased from ~7 to 5.5 over the first 5 pore volumes (PVs) for the non-weathered and partially weathered columns. Gradual decreases in effluent pH to ~ 4.5 were observed over time, with subsequent rapid pH decreases to < 3 observed after more than 50 PVs in these columns. Effluent pH was consistently <2.0 for the highly weathered columns. We attribute these effluent pH ranges to the dissolution of Mg-bearing carbonates (pH ~6.5 to 6), Fe-bearing carbonates (pH ~5.6 to 4.5), Al hydroxides (pH ~4.5 to 4.0), and silicates (pH < ~2). These interpretations are supported by pH-dependent increases in effluent concentrations of Fe (< 1 to > 500 mg L−1), Al (<0.1 to >10 mg L−1), Si (<0.1 to >10 mg L−1), and several additional metal(loid)s (e.g., Ni, Zn, V, As) associated with FTT minerals. Cumulative mass release for metal(loids) was typically highest in the non-weathered samples, and generally higher in solvent-washed compared to non-solvent washed sample splits. These results offer important new insight into relationships between acid neutralization and metal(loid) release in FTT deposits that can inform FTT management and reclamation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207