Adaptation aux changements induits aux indices spectraux de lâaudition spatiale chez lâhumain.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cas de perte auditive, la localisation spatiale est amoindrie et vient entraver\nla compréhension de la parole et ce, malgré le port de prothèses auditives. La\nprésente étude modifie la forme de l’oreille externe d’individus à l’aide de silicone\nafin d’induire des changements aux indices spectraux (HRTFs), similaires à ceux\ncausés par des prothèses auditives, et d’explorer les mécanismes perceptifs (visuel,\nspectral, ou tactile) permettant d’alterner d’un nouvel ensemble à l’ensemble\noriginel de HRTFs une fois les prothèses enlevées. Les résultats démontrent que\nles participants s’adaptent aux nouveaux HRTFs à l’intérieur de quatre séances\nd’entraînement. Dès le retrait des prothèses, les participants reviennent à leur\nperformance originale. Il n’est pas possible de conclure avec les données présentes\nsi le changement d’un ensemble de HRTFs à un autre est influencé par un des\nmécanismes de rétroaction perceptuelle étudié. L’adaptation aux prothèses perdure\njusqu’à quatre semaines après leur retrait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".