Alexithymie, santé et psychopathologie.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The term "alexithymia" is derived from the Greek and means "no words for feeling". Coined by Sifneos in 1972, alexithymia refers to a relative narrowing in emotional functioning. The salient clinical features of alexithymia include difficulties in recognizing and verbalizing feelings, endless description of physical symptoms instead of émotions, concrete speech and thought closely tied to external events, paucity of fantasy life. Although initially described in the context of psychosomatic illness, alexithymic characteristics may be observed in patients with a wide range of medical and psychiatric disorders. This study purpose to investigate the relationship between alexithymia and concepts of health's psychology: locus of control, family's cohesion and adaptability, personality's concepts,... Three groups of patients were established on base of their diagnosis: depression (n = 16), alcoholism (n = 16) and control group (n = 16). The following measures were administered: family's cohesion and adaptability (Olson), Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (Wallston and Wallston), externality scale (Rotter), Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. The results show alexithymic personality is less internal (t = 2.72; p = 0.011) than non-alexithymic subject (m = 20.88 +/- 6.19 vs m = 26.06 +/- 4.52). Furthermore the family's cohesion is lower (t = 2.961; p = 0.008) for the alexithymics than the non-alexithymics (m = 30.46 +/- 10.38 vs m = 40.27 +/- 5.44). This conclusions added to the more pathological personality's profile (11 scales on 14 were significant higher for for alexithymics) of alexithymics at the MMPI indicate alexithymia's concept is central in psychopathology if measures used are issued by the health's psychology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".