MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045186415

Agents of Inscription: Rewriting the Monumental Landscape at Place des Montréalaises

2023· dissertation· en· W7045186415 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic spaceStatueRepresentation (politics)PropositionParadiseSpace (punctuation)InstinctPublic artSculpture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a different constellation of urban struggles, women are the protagonists of a new form in the production of public space at the Place des Montréalaises (PDM). Combating the bronze ceiling, the PDM amends Montreal’s memory culture by “unforgetting” women in public representational space. This proposition argues for the representation of women via text-based art as the values represented via sculptural figurative elements have become obsolete. Serving as a case study, this proposition is being tested through a major piece of public urban design through the creation of a city park within a major Canadian city in front of its city hall. We are collectively witnessing the failures of a post-colonial heritage comprised of didactic and classical monuments in a contemporary world. Despite the eventual failures of the commemorative landscape, rooted in values and fixed in time, this does not preclude our collective instinct to memorialize. Rather it upholds a community’s endeavours to create a memorial landscape with the caveat that beliefs change with an acceptance that the relevancy of monuments will shift. I address two interwoven questions in this dissertation. The first examines the PDM in the orbit of social forces by re-evaluating monuments through an inclusive lens. As the PDM is being built, Montreal’s surrounding commemorative landscape is actively under reconsideration. Groups have focused their attention on three prominent statues owned by the Montreal public art program, resulting in two statues being toppled while the bronze statue of Queen Victoria on Sherbrook Street is under protective wrapping following a series of aesthetic actions: buckets of green paint were poured over the statue, followed by a second incident involving more-visible red paint. In this context, what role does the PDM have in building, maintaining, and contesting the city’s commemorative landscape? The second question examines the PDM as a case study in the deployment of art-based inscription as the aesthetic strategy of gender representation designed to work toward a more accurate reflection of Montreal’s evolution. Does art-based text have the power to reconfigure representations of gender through public memory production at the PDM?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.017
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→