Artífices y artificios : las fiestas celebradas en Madrid por la beatificación del bienaventurado Isidro, Mayo de 1620 = Artisans and artifice : the festivities in Madrid for the beatification of blessed Isidro, May 1620
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sobre los festejos que se celebraron en la villa de Madrid para honrar la beatificación del labrador Isidro, poco se ha escrito en los últimos años, no así en épocas antecedentes, existiendo diferentes autores que se extendieron sobre tales sucesos. Trinidad de Antonio, en un artículo fechado en 1994, se hacía eco de las celebraciones que Madrid organizó por la canonización de su patrono en 1622; nosotros queremos completar esta visión con las que fueron su antecedente, las solemnidades y ceremonias que tuvieron lugar en 1620 para exaltar su beatificación.\n\nOn the celebrations held in the city of\nMadrid to honor the beatification of Isidro\nLabrador, little has been published in\nrecent years, not in record time, there are\ndifferent authors that spread over such\nevents.\nTrinidad de Antonio, in an article dated in\n1994, echoed Madrid organized the\ncelebrations for the canonization of his\npatron in 1622; we want to complete this\nvision with which they were its antecedent,\nsolemnities and ceremonies that took\nplace in 1620 to enhance his beatification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".