Analisis Produktivitas Perusahaan Menggunakan Metode American Productivity Center ( APC )(Studi kasus : PT. Cahaya Bumi Intanpari)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The need for very high drinking water is utilized by PT. Cahaya Bumi Intanpari which is a manufacturing industry company, to produce bottled drinking water (AMDK) brand "AirMu". PT. Cahaya Bumi Intanpari is located in Temuireng Village, Tegal Gede, Karanganyar. In its development, PT. Cahaya Bumi Intanpari has never measured company performance, one way to measure company performance is by measuring its productivity. Measuring company productivity continuously at a certain time period can be used as a benchmark for company performance. For this reason productivity measurements are taken at PT. Cahaya Bumi Intanpari uses the American Productivity Center method. From the measurement results, the total productivity index value of the second quarter was 172.33%, the third quarter was 69.43%, the fourth quarter was 82.58, the fifth quarter was 109.56 and the fourth quarter was 85.75. And for the total profitability index of the second quarter of 100.79, the third quarter of 100.36, the fourth quarter of 100.72, the fifth quarter of 100.42, and the sixth quarter of 100.76. On the price improvement index fluctuated, in the second quarter with a value of 0.58, in the third quarter of 1.45, in the fourth quarter of 1.22, in the fifth quarter of 0.92 and in the sixth quarter of 1.18.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".