MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045271909

Assessment of high velocity head impacts using transcranial magnetic stimulation in Australian national ice hockey players: a multiple-case study

2017· other· en· W7045271909 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationIce hockeyConcussionLeagueLinear accelerationPoison controlInjury preventionHead injuryAthletes
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comprising of eight teams, players in the Australian Ice Hockey League (AIHL) are elite, attracting college players from the United States and Canada, as well as former professional players from European and American Leagues up to the standard of the National Hockey League (NHL). To date, no study has tracked in-game head impacts with follow-up measures in AIHL players. The aim of this multiple-case study was to investigate neurophysiological responses using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) following high impact events over the course of the 2016 AIHL season. Data was collected from 11 male players (28.8 ± 6.8 years) recruited from one AIHL team. Using previously published methods for concussion studies,1, 2 TMS (MagVenture, Denmark) was used to quantify corticospinal excitability, via motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and intracortical inhibition from TMS cortical silent period (cSP). Players who had registered a high threshold event (66 g or 4500 rads/s2) during the game using impact sensors (X2 Biosystems, USA) were compared at three and 10 days, to their baseline measures. Six players sustained in-match impacts of greater than 66 g or 4,500 rads/s2 (mean in- match linear acceleration of 93.48 ± 21.68 g; mean rotational acceleration of 12,532.76 ± 4,682.76 rads/s2). All six players showed no immediate signs or symptoms of concussion post-match. Clinical follow up, at three days post-match, revealed five of the six players were asymptomatic. However, three of these players showed an increase in cSP between 6.7 ms to 10.6 ms, returning to baseline levels by 10 days. Despite no immediate symptoms, one athlete who sustained a 98.8 g/19,703.89 rads/s2 impact was found to have delayed symptoms of concussion in follow up clinical assessment and testing at both three and 10 days post-match. This player demonstrated no change in MEP amplitude but displayed an increased cSP of 20.8 ms at three days, remaining increased by 23.98 ms at 10 days, in comparison to baseline. The findings of this study reinforce previous TMS studies investigating corticospinal responses during the acute recovery phase following concussion.1-3 This multi-case study illustrates measureable changes in corticospinal excitability associated with high impact head trauma that may not manifest as concussion immediately, and can also be an adjunct to follow up clinical assessment for return to play decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0130.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)French-language works237,207