Acute inpatient rehabilitation for a patient following a total hip arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A patient with right total hip arthroplasty was seen for physical therapy treatment for seven sessions over the course of four days in the hospital.Treatment was provided by a student physical therapist under the supervision of a licensed physical therapist.The patient was evaluated at the initial encounter with Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 10 Meter Walk Test, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Boston University Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6clicks" Basic Mobility Inpatient Short Form, and a plan of care was established.The main goals for the patient were to decrease pain severity, improve basic functional mobility, increase gait speed, and advance health related quality of life.The principal interventions used were resistance training, over-ground gait training, task-specific training, and functional training.The severity of the patient's pain improved significantly [75%], and, to a lesser degree, basic functional mobility and gait speed vi improved as well.The patient was discharged to an extended care facility for further physical therapy treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".