MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045331180

Andreas Wyller (1919-1944) alpinist, motstandsmann og krigsflyver

2020· article· no· W7045331180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShetlandGloom
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andreas Wyller fra Voksenlia i Oslo, var i 1938 vår første Norgesmester i alpint . Året før startet han å stikke ut Wyller løypa som i dag er en del av Oslo Vinterpark. 9.april 1940 kom han til Oslo etter å ha blitt Norgesmester igjen, denne gangen i Åndalsnes. Med brukket ben meldte han seg raskt til tjeneste på Smestad brannstasjon som ble nettverket for all motstand i Oslo, men som også hadde sine grener til Torsvik gruppen i Ålesund. Torsvik gruppen var de første som sendte flyktninger med fiskebåter til Shetland og Andreas dro i mars 1941. Før det hadde han ledet en Milorg-gruppe på Voksenlia. Fra Shetland via London dro han til Little Norway i Canada og ble utdannet bombe flyver. Før han ble beordret til 333 B skvadronen i Leuchars i Skottland, fløy han på turne for den svensk/amerikanske organisasjonen "Wings for Norway". På turneen ble det samlet inn rundt 300 000 dollars, som gikk til innkjøp av trenings fly i Little Norway. I Leuchars fløy han rekognosering sammen med sin faste navigatør Bård Karl Benjaminsen fra Harstad. Utenfor Egersund - den 23. februar 1944, kom de i kamp med tyske fly og styrtet i sjøen. I dag er han et navn i Nordmarka i Oslo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→