AKTIVITASORKES KRONCONG NADA KASIH DALAM MELESTARIKAN \nLAGU-LAGU KERONCONG DI DESA TRIHARJO KECAMATAN SLEMAN KABUPATEN SLEMAN DIY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aktivitas Orkes Keroncong Nadakasih memberi dampak positif bagi perkembangan \norkes keroncong dan lagu keroncong di Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta dalam upaya \nmelestarikan musik keroncong agar digemari oleh masyarakat dan generasi muda. \nMemberikan dampak positif bagi perkembangan musik keroncong melalui pertunjukan \nmusik, sarsehan serta aktivitas sosial lainnya, sehingga orkes keroncong Nadakasih tetap \nberkiprah sebagai orkes keroncong yang memiliki potensi pemain yang cukup baik saat ini. \nPelayanan publik secara kronologis mengalami peningkatan dalam membangun bangsa \ndengan tetap konsisten menyebarkan repertoar musik keroncong sebagai penguatan jati diri \nbangsa. \n \nKata Kunci: Aktivitas, Orkes Keroncong Nadaksih,Melestarikan Lagu Keroncong
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".