Alteridades possíveis com jovens estrangeiros : diferenças e diversidade cultural em documentários
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates how documentary films dealing with cultural differences and diversity contribute to experiences of alterity in the adaptation process of young immigrants and refugees, especially in poetics that include other artistic languages. It also discusses how intercultural relations between local people and foreigners take place in integration and inclusion processes within educational contexts. To this end, we conduct a comparative analysis between the films Bagages (Canada, 2017) and Cara do Mundo (Brazil, 2016), based on studies by Mikhail Bakhtin (2003) that address alterity; on experiences by Alain Bergala (2008) about the potential of cinema in education and with young adults, as well as on ideas by Denys Cuche (1999) and Homi K. Bhabha (1998) involving cultural differences and diversity. Using criteria that respect categories such as the context in which the films were made, we analyze how the documentary narratives studied were appropriated in specific social processes and discuss the use of these audiovisual products in the process of building experiences of alterity and social insertion involving young immigrants and refugees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".