Arbetsprogram 2007 : Task Forcen for energiforsyning i tyndt befolkede områder under EK-NER (forkortes TBO)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Det politiske mål er at understrege og vægte en langsigtet indsats for udbredelsen af vedvarende energi, også i de tyndt befolkede områder, samt gennem det estnordiske samarbejde at sætte fokus på samarbejdet med Nordens naboer mod vest, især i Canada og på Shetlandsøerne. Andre vigtige samarbejdspartnere er Vestnordisk Råd, Arktisk Råd og Barentsrådet. De overordnede mål for TBO er at sætte fokus på Nordens og især Vestnordens tyndt befolkede områder ved at initiere og følge op på projekter, der har til formål at udveksle viden om decentraliseret kraftforsyning, som kan mindske afhængigheden af fossile brændsler. Et entralt element for dette mål er udnyttelsen af lokale vedvarende energikilder. at være sparringpartner og styregruppe for projekter, der afvikles i samarbejde med eller under TBO at formulere, udbyde og gennemføre projekter. Der vedlægges revideret mandat for 2007.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.084 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".