MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045414553

ASESMEN KUALITAS AIR PADA TAMBAK PEMBESARAN BENIH UDANG VANAME (Litopenaeus vannamei) BERDASARKAN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS DAN
\nWATER QUALITY INDEX
\n

2024· other· id· W7045414553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigilib Repository Unila (Lampung University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)Work (physics)Standard uncertaintyPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Provinsi Lampung adalah penghasil udang terbesar di Indonesia. Salah satu kegiatan budidaya udang yang menentukan keberhasilan produksi udang adalah PT. Citra Larva Cemerlang yang menyediakan benih udang yang berkualitas, berlokasi di Kalianda, Lampung Selatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kualitas air pada tambak pembesaran benih udang dengan pengelompokan parameter prioritas penting dalam penentuan kualitas air.
\nPenelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analitik. Data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dari data pengamatan in situ, hasil analisis di Laboratorium Terpadu dan Sentra Inovasi Teknologi (LTSIT), hasil wawancara, observasi lapangan, dan pengisian kuesioner. Metode analisis data untuk mengetahui kualitas air adalah dengan membandingkan data hasil uji dengan baku mutu air. Dalam mengelompokkan parameter, digunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan penilaian kualitas air dengan Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI). 
\nHasil yang diperoleh pH (8,03-8,25), suhu (24,24-28,16 οC), salinitas (31,2-33,4%), dan oksigen terlarut (6,6-7,3 mg/L), kekeruhan (0-2,3 NTU), Total Suspended Solid (TSS) berkisar antara 0,33-0,46 mg/L, amonia (0-0,8 mg/L), fosfat (0,01-0,22 mg/L), nitrat (0,16-0,32 mg/L), Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) berkisar antara 0,77-4,68 mg/L), dan logam berat (Cr, Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni) yang rata-rata nilainya melebihi baku mutu, hanya kandungan logam Cu tidak melebihi baku mutu air. Analisis parameter kualitas air menggunakan AHP dan CCME WQI menunjukkan bahwa sampel air memiliki kualitas air yang kurang baik. sehingga memerlukan perbaikan kualitas air. Perbaikan dapat dilakukan dengan cara meningkatkan aerasi, penggantian air secara rutin, pengangkatan lumpur, penggunaan probiotik dan pemantauan rutin terhadap parameter kualitas air untuk menjaga keseimbangan ekosistem.
\n
\nKata kunci: Kualitas air, pembenihan, udang vaname, AHP, WQI
\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigilib Repository Unila (Lampung University)Same topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207