MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045414607

The Agbiotech Bulletin, Volume 2, Issue 6, October 1994

2010· article· en· W7045414607 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntellectual propertyChinaAgency (philosophy)DirectoryGenetically engineeredAgricultural biotechnologyGene transfer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Agbiotech Bulletin, Volume 2, Issue 6, October 1994 Code Number: NL95015 Size of Files: Text: 69K No associated graphics files AG-WEST 5TH ANNUAL MEETING An Industry in Transition AgCanada Goes to Market Knowledge-based Banking REGULATORY AFFAIRS One-Window Environmental Assessment Service Biotech Guidelines & Regs Coming Agriculture and Agri-food Canada guidelines for biotechnological products based on plants and animals are expected to be done by December, 1995. Biodiversity Strategy Nearing Completion Quality Control Eases Regulatory Process TRENDS Science and Technology Important to Future Agriculture: Goodale Government Review Targets Science and Technology FINANCE ADF Approves $2.7 Million in Projects LEGAL NOTES Importance of Patent Date a Mystery Canadian Biotech Law Text Released ATTITUDES Fear of Change BUSINESS Sask. Soil Testing Privatized The UofS and Ag-Spec Analytical Services of Saskatoon have announced the formation of Plains Innovative Laboratory Services to replace the University's Soil Testing Laboratory. Biovail UofS Collaboration RECENT DEVELOPMENTS New Potato Virus Test Saves Time Oats Without Hulls Plastic from Canola First Genetically Engineered Wheat Rumen Booster NETWORK NOTES Technology Transfer Information Made Easy B.C. Joins Ag Education Council New Director for Ag in the Schools When a Weed is Not a Weed Minerva Animal Health Launched Calgary Canola Research Company Seeking Partners Alberta Company Strikes at Hamburger Disease New Facility for UofM Ag Research Fourth Pacific Rim Biotech Conference Nature Versus Crop Land Microbial Sleuths Meet A microbial detection workshop was recently held in Saskatoon for representatives from industry, science and government. Prime Minister Releases NABST Report Canadian Technology Network Innaugerated RESOURCES The Ultimate Reference Centre An International Knowledge Powerhouse Environmental Tech Booster A Guide to Disease and Pests Reaching Out to Farmers in Developing Countries A History of Biotechnology 477-PIGS If you have questions about swine, call the Prairie Swine Centre's "Pig Line." The Centre also provides information through its newsletter, Centred on Swine, and through fact sheets, scientific papers, magazine artricles and proceedings. Biotechnology Information Source Available at Ag-West Biotech in Saskatoon is a list of National Agricultural Library quick-referrence bibliographies substantial resources for recent research on such topics as plant nutrition, gene expression in horticultural and field crops, transgenic animals, and biofuels. PEOPLE WATCH AgriCapital Corporation Ag-West Biotech Awards Received National S&T Advisory Board IPGRI Biomira Inc. BIOSTAR Canadian Institute of Biotechnology BIO Calgene Cangene Corporation Connaught Laboratories Ltd. Industrial Biotechnology Association of Canada National Research Council Pacific Forestry Research Centre Prizm Pharmaceuticals Quorum Growth Inc. Articles, announcements and suggestions are welcome. The AgBiotech Bulletin is published by Westcross House Publications 608 Duchess Street Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7K 0R1 Phone: (306) 934-1772 fax: (306) 664-6615 October 21, 1994 Agbiotech Newsflash Canadian Regulatory Progress Greeted with Optimism

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4120.422

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→