Bibliographic record
Abstract
East of the Rocky Mountains, Purple Martins (Progne subis) nest almost exclusively in housing provided by humans.This dependency, their tractable nature, and their strong fidelity to nesting colonies, make Purple Martins ready subjects for banding based studies.The Purple Martin Conservation Association has been banding martins since 1995, totaling over 14,000.The PMCA along with researchers from York University in Toronto, Ontario, are studying parentage, survival, and dispersal in Purple Martins.As in many species of birds, martins engage in extra-pair copulations, resulting in males providing for young that are not necessarily their own.In 2006 and 2007, we took blood samples from 287 complete family sets to study parentage.Radio transmitters were attached to 16 fledgling martins for the 2007 season to study post-fledging dispersal.Results from the Purple Martin Conservation Association's longterm banding program, as well as preliminary results from genetic and radio telemetry studies are presented. Years of Bird Banding at Allegheny Front Migration Observatory -
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.721 | 0.602 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".