MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045526075

Assessing the chemical and biological recovery of Killarney Provincial Park lakes from historical acidification

2018· dissertation· en· W7045526075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZooplanktonWater qualitySpecies richnessThreatened speciesAquatic ecosystemEutrophicationAcid depositionLimnologyAbiotic component
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the mid 1900s, acidification has impacted water quality and threatened the ecological integrity of thousands of lakes and streams across Eastern North America and Europe. After the implementation of industrial emission reductions programs in the late 1960s, chemical recovery of historically acid-damaged lakes was observed, but a lag in biological recovery has been partially attributed to changes in multiple environmental variables, such as warming climate, shoreline development, and the introduction and spread of invasive species. To assess the continued recovery of historically acidified lakes, forty-four lakes were sampled for zooplankton and water chemistry in and around Killarney Provincial Park during peak emissions in 1972-73, through the decades after emission reduction programs were implemented in 1990, 2000, 2005, 2011, and 2016. We assessed changes in both univariate and multivariate zooplankton community metrics through time, and evaluated recovery using a reference lake approach that included 8 circumneutral lakes within Killarney Provincial Park and 55 non- acidified lakes in Algonquin Provincial Park. In addition, we assessed the relative importance of local biotic and abiotic variables in shaping recovering zooplankton communities in Killarney and Algonquin Provincial Parks. We found strong evidence for continued chemical and biological recovery in acidified lakes in Killarney Provincial Park. Species richness and diversity increased in acid-recovered lakes to values statistically indistinguishable from those of our reference lakes, and multivariate-based community composition shifted towards a community structure more similar to reference lakes. Several variables were identified as important drivers of zooplankton community structure, including pH and ion concentrations, nutrient concentrations, fish community, water clarity, maximum lake depth, and surface area, with environmental variables accounting for less variation in communities through time. Overall, these results indicated that recovery is still progressing in historically acidified lakes, and unlike similar Canadian Shield communities that did not experience severe acidification, pH and its legacy effects are still acting as primary drivers of zooplankton community structure in Killarney Provincial Park lakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→