MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045548035

Aspectos jurídicos y económicos de la titulación de tierras en Costa Rica

2014· article· es· W7045548035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture, Water, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaPersonaQuantitative methodology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los terrenos baldíos en Costa Rica han servido durante largo tiempo como solución a muchos de sus problemas económicos y sociales. Durante el tiempo en que la población de Costa Rica fue pequeña y, por lo general, confinada a la Meseta o Valle Central, los terrenos baldíos situados más allá de la Meseta fueron usados indistintamente como una fuente para aumentar las recaudaciones del Fisco, para compensar a los ciudadanos por servicios especiales y particularmente, como un medio para resolver los problemas de desempleo y de inquietud socail durante los tiempos de tensión en la economía. A los agricultores marginales o sin empleo de la Meseta o Valle Central que se quejaron de no estar recibiendo ninguno delos beneficios de la economía de esa área se les aconsejó solucionar por sí mismos su problema de los terrenos baldíos, denunciando tierras y construyendo sus propias fincas. El crecimiento de la población y una economía estable pero cerrada en el Valle Central empujó amiles de personas a buscar oportunidades en los terrenos baldíos más allá de la Meseta. El resultado ha sido la colonización sino control, sin planear, de casi todo potencial agrícola en tierras de Costa Rica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicAgriculture, Water, and HealthFrench-language works237,207