Au-delà des intentions de collégialité de la vigilance environnementale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le tournant participatif de la vigilance environnementale relève d’évolutions multiples, sociotechniques avec l’essor du numérique, organisationnelles avec la généralisation des infrastructures de la connaissance, et politique avec les injonctions envers la population à prendre plus part à la vie publique. Dans cet article introductif, il est montré que cette participation ne se résume pas à la plus ou moins grande collégialité de la façon dont sont menées les initiatives participatives de monitoring environnemental. La notion de médiation, décomposant l’architecture de ces initiatives, celle de gouvernance relative à une vision systémique de leur allocation du pouvoir, et enfin le positionnement réflexif du chercheur sociologue qu’elles impliquent permet de les resituer dans les enjeux auxquels leurs promoteurs et leurs observateurs sont confrontés. Il s’agit de restaurer l’incertitude sur leur portée, pesant sur ces dispositifs de monitoring en ce moment de mutation de la vigilance environnementale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".