Automatic Generation of Residential Thermal Network Models for Predictive Control from Smart Thermostat Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Model Predictive Control (MPC) can help a building achieve specific objectives, such as reducing operating cost, minimizing energy consumption, or implementing demand response measures. As its name indicates, MPC relies on an accurate building model. However, determining the model structure and level of detail can be challenging. An extensive analysis on a building-by-building basis is typically required, involving significant time and cost. The task of creating a model remains a critical hurdle for the large-scale uptake of MPC. \nThis thesis contributes a systematic method to generate control-oriented residential building thermal models with focus on day-ahead predictions for MPC. The method relies on data from smart thermostats, since their widespread adoption provides a unique opportunity to develop advanced control strategies. The method presented here can be categorized into two main approaches: single-zone and multi-zone models. \nWhen detailed data are available for each room, multi-zone models may provide better estimates of comfort and flexibility. Québec presents an excellent opportunity for testing multi-zone models because of its widespread utilization of decentralized electric baseboards that allow for individual room control. This research introduces a novel automatic method for multi-zone model generation and selection. The methodology starts with a very simple model and iteratively increases the complexity of the model until the model quality cannot increase further. It is then applied on data from an unoccupied experimental house in Shawinigan, Québec. The resulting 13th-order model can accurately predict all 9 zone temperatures 24 hours in advance, with a Root Mean Squared Error of less than 0.5 °C and its parameters reflect the layout of the house, previously unknown to the methodology. \nThe method was applied in a real-time MPC framework to the experimental house during demand response events and compared to MPC using low-order models and a “business-as-usual” (BAU) reference approach. The MPC employing the multi-zone model modeled the building thermal mass separately and managed to leverage it better to preheat more before demand response events compared to the low-order models. The MPC controller with the multi-zone model reduced electricity costs by 55% compared to the BAU scenario; it also outperformed the 40% cost reduction achieved by MPC controllers based on low-order models. \nOn the other hand, a single thermal zone representation can produce sufficiently accurate predictions when coupled with (uncertain) weather and occupancy forecasts. Second-order single-zone models of 7,800 houses in Ontario and Québec were used to investigate the most suitable data length, data interval and calibration horizon of building models for use in an MPC framework. Overall, models with a calibration horizon of 24 hours, data length of 7 days and time interval of 15 minutes provided the best balance between accuracy and computational resources. The models were then used to assess the large-scale deployment of MPC strategies under existing time-of-use tariffs and dynamic pricing. Results showed that the adoption of MPC can reduce the daily electricity cost on average by 16% in Ontario and by 31% in Québec, respectively. \nLastly, this thesis used smart thermostat data to model and characterize 60,000 homes across North America (the resulting model parameters have been made publicly available, enabling building archetypes and building-to-building knowledge transfer). The results showed that just modeling the indoor air temperature of the building may not suffice. Instead, single-zone models need additional states (e.g., for effective temperature of the exterior and/or interior building materials) for accurate predictions. The building time constants were computed as a means to assess building thermal storage ability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".