Auto ethnography: Journey in decolonizing and Indigenizing my teaching and curriculum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To begin I would like to acknowledge and give honour to the Secwepemc—the ancestral peoples who have lived here for thousands of years—upon whose traditional and unceded land Thompson Rivers University is located. The Secwepemc maintain a spiritual and practical relationship to the land, water, air, animals, plants and all things needed for life on Mother Earth. It is with that in mind that we owe this debt of gratitude. (ALBAA Research Team, 2010, p.1)\nI have been a part of the educational system for nineteen years now. I have completed from kindergarten to grade twelve, and then completed six years of postsecondary schooling resulting in two degrees: A Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Education. I am a life-long learner and just begun my journey as an educator. Upon entering the Bachelor of Education one of the first topics covered was the release of the New BC Curriculum. It was made clear to us that we were required to incorporate Aboriginal ways of knowing and pedagogies across the curriculum in our teaching in a meaningful way. This is part of the nationwide efforts to reconcile and a response to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Calls for Action (TRCR, 2015), specifically to the statement “Education got us into this mess, education should take us out of it (Sinclair, 2015). This has led to teachers across Canada to engage in the process of Indigenization. Previous to the experiences with Indigenous curriculum, the Bachelor of Education provided me with, I had remained ignorant to much of Indigenous history, culture, language, and the people who inhabited the land around me. I knew very little about Aboriginal world views and pedagogies. It this important education was absent from my upbringing and experience with the public education system.\nIn my first year of the Bachelor of Education program, I was given an assignment to create a children’s book or educational center that incorporated Aboriginal worldviews and pedagogies. This is where my journey toward decolonization truly started. The children’s book that I created for that class was the catalyst that helped me dive deeper into this self reflective process. By working with a team including my supervisor and Indigenous eductors and advisors, I have been learning about incorporating Indigenous worldviews and pedagogies into my teaching and learning. This has encouraged me along the process of understanding decolonization and Indigenizing my teaching to become an effective educator. The assignment lead me to create a story called Tail of Tails, which was based on an Ojibway story about how the beaver got a flat tail. This process was an eye opening experience into the world of Indigenous knowledges and worldviews. This would have been impossible without the many people I consulted with to ensure the book followed Aboriginal pedagogies and content. It went under many revisions to ensure the ending of the story reflected Aboriginal worldviews as I was a non-Indigenous person writing about Indigenous content. This was not a road I anticipated having to navigate in my life, but I was thankful for the opportunity as it gave me the chance to create relationships and work alongside many Indigenous storytellers and minds. It brought me the opportunity to learn local Secwepemc language and worldviews I would not have been able to experience otherwise.\nThe primary purpose of this research project was to engage in an exploration which would prompt a deeper understanding of Aboriginal culture, progress in my journey to decolonizing education, openness to other cultures and worldviews, and ultimately to become a better educator. The insights from this auto ethnographic study will assist other teachers and teacher candidates in their own journey to decolonize and indigenize education. It will provide an example of how to incorporate indigenous language and worldviews in elementary classrooms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".