MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045635955

Associations between specific bovine leukocyte antigen DRB3 alleles and mastitis in Canadian Holsteins

2003· dissertation· en· W7045635955 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMastitisAlleleGenotypingHerdTypingGenotypeAntigenSomatic cell countDairy cattle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Associations between bovine leukoctye antigen alleles 'DRB3.2*16 ' and '*23' and mastitis in Canadian Holsteins were investigated. In order to facilitate the genotyping of a large population, a rapid PCR screening method, multi-primer target-PCR (MPT-PCR) was developed. Four primers were combined in one PCR reaction to detect the presence of alleles ' DRB3.2*16' and '*23' simultaneously. Cows (n = 3157), from 56 herds monitored for mastitis for 18 months, were then genotyped by MPT-PCR. No associations were found between the alleles and clinical mastitis, mastitis at calving or somatic cell score. However, 'DRB3.2*23' was significantly associated with an increased occurrence of subclinical mastitis caused by bacterial pathogens (p <= 0.10), and specifically by ' Escherichia coli' (p <= 0.10) and by 'Streptococcus' spp. (p <= 0.05). In contrast, 'DRB3.2*16' was associated with a decreased occurrence of subclinical mastitis caused by 'Strep. ' spp. (p <= 0.05). Further studies are required to reveal the underlying biological mechanisms contributing to the increased or decreased risk of disease associated with these alleles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207