‘BRING US BACK TO THE FUTURE, NOT FORWARD TO THE PAST’: THE MODERNIST SENSIBILITIES AND POSTMODERN ANXIETIES OF EXCLAIM! MAGAZINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a discourse analysis of the free, Canadian, alternative music monthly Exclaim! magazine. Since Exclaim! is the only nationally-distributed alternative music monthly in Canada, its discourses are a solid entry point into the kinds of ideological values that circulate within the Canadian indie music community. This study of Exclaim! also examines the historical (postmodern, post-alternative rock, grunge) and industrial context of the magazine’s discourses. This analysis suggests that although Exclaim!'s discourses and appraisals - as well as the (Canadian) popular music subculture that it documents - could be considered to be an example of the postmodern collapse of the boundaries between high culture and low culture, it can be more accurately described as part of a historically conscious, modernist, and avant-gardist realm that exists firmly within popular music culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.081 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".