MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045675231

Augmenting Navigation Systems for Near Real-Time Scenarios Using LiDAR

2023· dissertation· en· W7045675231 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarPoint cloudSegmentationRangingReliability (semiconductor)Ground segmentKey (lock)Point (geometry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are critical components of today's intelligent transport applications. They work in conjunction with Road Network Graphs (RNGs), real-world abstractions of transportation infrastructure, to provide services such as location awareness, route-finding, and point-to-point navigation. When the availability or reliability of RNGs becomes an issue, such as in rural environments where data may not be available or in evolving scenarios where real-time data is needed such as disasters, omnipresent navigational systems are unable to cope. In this work, we explore the feasibility of adapting aerially captured Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) point clouds for the purposes of both providing a direct means of navigational assistance as well as augmenting existing RNGs. Toward this end, we present a ground segmentation algorithm to identify ground points in a given city-scale point cloud, and a path-planning algorithm building on this segmentation designed to produce plausible paths through an urban area. Our ground segmentation method achieves an average accuracy of 86\% on 36 point cloud dataset tiles from the Sensaturban dataset, performing better on tiles with more points, and completing both segmentation and classification steps in an average of 86 seconds per 1,000,000 points. It also demonstrates effective qualitative performance on a tile from the Vancouver LiDAR dataset. Our proposed path generation algorithm demonstrates an 85\% error reduction in a challenging scenario using only the LiDAR point cloud and its image-analogous gradients as input. We discuss the inexistence of a suitable dataset, presenting a barrier for a large-scale analysis and comparison in this problem. Many current leading techniques in point cloud processing employ some form of learning, furthering the need for such a dataset. We conclude by discussing some design considerations of such a dataset and present directions for future research in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207