MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045696509

Autonomia municipal fundamental: a federação e a posição de destaque dos municípios na efetivação de direitos fundamentais no Brasil

2015· article· en· W7045696509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Government (linguistics)LegislatureContext (archaeology)PopulationPosition (finance)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Federacy is a phenomenon appeared recently in Science world-wide Politics, after the historical aggregation of the thirteen English former-colonies in the North America, initially in Confederation, in the year of 1777, reaching the indissolvable pact ten years later, in 1787, making born the United States of America and inaugurating the form of State characterized by the politician-administrative decentralization, constituting partial independent beings, allies to the Union and forming the all, that it is the sovereign Federal State. Full autonomy and participation in the formation of the national will are the basic principles of the federative model, what differs it from the unitary countries, spreading this model all over the planet, specially in the countries with great territorial dimensions, as the case of Germany, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, India, Mexico, Russia, Venezuela, amongst others. The Cities are generally not considered federated beings, to the exception of Brazilian case, despite they enjoy a reasonable constitutional autonomy and abilities. In the Unitary States, however, almost always they are associated to the regional beings and the central power, possessing mere administrative autonomy, although to be respected the main local interest. The historical importance of Brazilian cities and the spontaneous appearance of its, even before the formation of the State made possible, thus, the development of municipalist currents, with was decisive in the position of prominence that today they have as basic part of the Brazilian Federacy, from 1988. In fact, they possess constitutional abilities, they are cited as component of the indissolvable union that forms the Federative Republic of Brazil and withholds full autonomy, configured in the three functions (politics, administrative and financial), being the first one of them delineated by self-government, the self-organization or self-constitution, and by the self-legislation. Thus, having these capabilities, the Cities are apt to management the basic rights next to the community, in special, the social rights, unforgettable conquest of the modern society and essential for the maintenance of the Democratic Social State and the Ambient of Right. For this, they need to use the advantage of its high constitutional autonomy and to direct its material and legislative abilities in the direction to protect and to accomplish such rights, through warranting public politics of the social functions of the city.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207