MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045773688

Buried Surface Horizons in Saskatchewan Croplands Provide Insight into Microbial Soil Carbon Cycling and Development of Persistent Organic Matter

2024· dissertation· en· W7045773688 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsoilSoil waterMineralization (soil science)Organic matterSoil carbonSoil horizonTotal organic carbonCyclingSoil organic matter
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accumulation of soil from hillslope erosion in depositional landscape positions can bury the original A horizon soil, leading to a disconnect of C-rich surface soils from surface environments due to burial. The buried C then serves as the primary C for the buried native microbial community. The goal of this thesis was to quantify and characterize the soil organic C (SOC) and examine microbial decomposition of this C in buried surface horizons, decades after burial. Surface (Ah) soils were sampled at 0-10 cm, buried surface (Ahb) soils were identified around 40-50 cm deep, and buried subsoil (Bmb) soils were sampled directly below Ahb soils. Buried surface (Ahb) soils had a SOC content (25.6 mg OC g-1 soil) similar to the corresponding surface (Ah) soil (30.9 mg OC g-1 soil), but greater than Bmb subsoil horizons (8.7 mg OC g-1 soil). Microbial abundance was reduced in Ahb vs. Ah horizons (Total PLFA: Ah = 77.2 nmol g-1 soil, Ahb = 26.8 nmol g-1 soil), however enough viable biomass remained to suggest microbial C cycling was still occurring in Ahb horizons. Over the course of a 100-day controlled incubation experiment, the susceptibility of SOC in Ahb horizons to mineralization to CO2 was 4x lower than corresponding Ah horizons. Carbon mineralization was strongly correlated with mineral-associated organic matter (Rho = -0.67, p < 0.01) in Ah horizons but not in Ahb horizons. Microbial community structure in Ahb horizons was distinct from surface soils, suggesting co-development of the community with increasingly persistent C as decomposition proceeded in the decades after burial. Similar quantities and concentrations of microbial necromass (amino sugars) remained in the Ahb vs. Ah horizon but were strongly correlated with clay only in the Ahb horizons (Rho = 0.77, p < 0.001). Further, microbial communities in Ahb horizons were more thermodynamically efficient at utilizing added glucose than Ah horizons (72 vs. 64 % energy retained) but had a lower calorespirometric ratio under basal metabolism (841 vs 3106 kJ mol-1 CO2-C), suggesting communities are adapted to intense C recycling due to energy limitations of the buried C. This research highlights the co-development of distinct microbial communities with persistent C in buried soils with limited fresh C inputs and examines C persistence in soils after repeated microbial decomposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207