MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045815151

Bridging the Gap Between Lidar, Thermal, and Multispectral Remote Sensing for Irrigation Scheduling Applications

2024· dissertation· en· W7045815151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrrigation schedulingNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexSoil waterWater contentIrrigationLeaf area indexGrowing seasonVegetation (pathology)Soil textureMultispectral pattern recognition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irrigation reduces the soil moisture deficit in crop production; however, the Canadian Prairies is a semi-arid landscape with limited water resource availability, requiring careful application of water management practices. This thesis studies methods to reduce irrigation water consumption in agricultural fields with complex soil texture dynamics using the water deficit index (WDI) to indirectly detect crop water stress and measure root zone soil moisture. This index is an extension of the crop water stress index (CWSI) that uses remotely sensed surface temperature (Ts) in addition to the fraction of vegetation (fc) to estimate the crop evaporative fraction through manipulation of the available energy balance equation. Seasonal and spatial relationships between WDI and volumetric water content (VWC) over a wheat and pea crop were observed at a study site with heterogeneous soil textures over two growing seasons; wheat was planted in the first growing season, and pea was planted in the second. Ten ground-based stations were used to observe average daily fluctuations in WDI by measuring Ts and deriving fc using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Results indicated that deep layers of sandier soils are more likely to cause high variations of WDI during dry-down events. Remotely sensed WDI agrees with measured eddy covariant energy fluxes at the beginning to middle of the growing season; however, NDVI is impacted by leaf senescence after seed fill for both crops, reducing the accuracy of WDI later in the growing season because of errors in fc. Light detection and ranging (lidar) is introduced as a more sophisticated approach to obtain fc and is used as a method to validate WDI obtained using NDVI canopy fraction using unpiloted aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery during the pea growing season. Canopy fraction obtained using NDVI UAV imagery produced WDI values that agreed with canopy fraction derived using lidar demonstrating that NDVI provides accurate fc for the calculation of WDI. A technical analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of crop height models obtained using Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry techniques compared to lidar. Photogrammetry crop height models were obtained using high-quality red-green-blue (RGB) imagery with accurate real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning, or RGB, multispectral and thermal imagery georeferenced using 3D ground control points (3D-GCPs); thermal and RGB SfM crop height models georeferenced using 3D-GCPs were inaccurate when compared to lidar crop heights. Further analysis was performed on identifying the empirical relationship that existed between lidar-derived fc and crop height for wheat and pea crops. The ability to track seasonal and spatial relationships between WDI and VWC, and the ability to obtain crop height models using multispectral imagery provides exciting progress at bridging the gap between thermal, multispectral and lidar remote sensing for irrigation scheduling applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207