MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045860130

Changes in IEC 61511 2nd Edition

2018· other· en· W7045860130 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsEmergent BioSolutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSafety instrumented systemIEC 61508Process (computing)Presentation (obstetrics)Safety standards
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

84 standard ("Application of Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industries") was first released in 1996.During the time of the development of ISA 84, the IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) was working on the 61511 standard ("Functional Safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector").IEC 61511 was first released in 2003.ISA adopted the 61511 standard, with one additional clause, as ISA 84-2004.The IEC released a second edition of 61511 in 2016, followed shortly thereafter with a corrigendum (list of corrections) and an amendment that were finalized in 2017.The ISA 84 committee voted to accept the revised standard without modifications, and released it in mid-2018 as ISA 61511-2018.This presentation will summarize the changes in the new standard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8480.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207