MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045872648

Biochar and Ash Amendments to Improve Soil Phosphorus Fertility, Water Relations and Retention

2023· dissertation· en· W7045872648 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiocharManurePhosphorusSoil waterSlash-and-charFertilizerNutrientWillowSoil conditioner
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biochar and ash, both as separate products and including ash as a component of biochar, are produced as by-products from thermochemical decomposition and bio-energy generation processes such as combustion, gasification, or pyrolysis. The addition of biochar to improve nutrient uptake and retention has been studied in various settings and with a variety of crops. However, biochar, when applied without other treatments, has often been found to have limited impact on crop yields in Canadian prairie soils. This study aimed to determine the effects of biochar amendments, with and without added phosphorus fertilizer, on soils and crops in the Canadian prairies as related to crop yield, phosphorus uptake and recovery, soil phosphorus retention, water dynamics and phosphorus loss in leachate and runoff. This thesis reports on studies undertaken in 2022 with biochar and phosphorus fertilizer amendments on nutrient poor soils from the brown and black soil zones in southern Saskatchewan (controlled environment study) and from the brown soil zone at a site near Central Butte, Saskatchewan (field study). Under optimal conditions of the growth chamber, biochar derived from canola hull, manure and willow feedstocks were shown to contribute some available P for plant uptake, with observed recovery of applied biochar P being at best about 50% of Triple Superphosphate fertilizer. The biochars increased residual P in soil in both chamber and field depending on feedstock, with manure and willow biochars as well as the meat and bonemeal ash being the most effective, but the effects of biochar amendments on crop yield were variable, leading to the conclusion that the effects are at least partly related to the biochar feedstock and production conditions, as has been shown in many other studies on biochar. An important benefit of biochar amendment observed in the study was increased phosphorus retention in soil that contributed to increased post-harvest labile P as well as reduced leaching and snowmelt runoff export. To a lesser extent the biochars contributed to increased water holding capacity and water infiltration. The results of this study indicate that biochars and ash can potentially benefit canola and wheat production, by enhancing P nutrition and recovery, and that a balance may be obtained between biochar supplying P during the growing season while at the end of the season reducing P loss in the spring snowmelt runoff or during leaching events. Biochar added at 10 tonnes per ha showed the best performance in terms of agricultural improvement potential under both controlled environment and field conditions when applied to brown and black chernozem soils from southern Saskatchewan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207