Compression moulding of discontinuous-fibre carbon/PEEK composites: Study of mechanical properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new multi-disciplinary study is being conducted to systematically evaluate, characterize and model the moulding process and mechanical properties of composites manufactured fro mrandomly-oriented carbon/PEEK chopped strips. The heterogeneous meso-structure of this material is expected to give rise to unique material behaviour, which is not entirely accounted for in the current ASTM standards for mechanical testing. This paper presents results of a sensitivity study aimed to evaluate the dependence of measured properties on the size of the coupon gauge section. Coupons of different widths (12.5 - 50 mm) were cut from compression moulded flat panels of randomly oriented chopped strips 25 mm in length and were subjected to quasi-static tensile loading. Results did not show any noticeable effect of the coupon width on the measured properties. Tensile strength and stiffness were found to be substantially lower than those of quasi-isotropic continuous fiber laminates, 59 % and 26 % lower, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".