Characterizing Plankton communities in Lake Ontario coastal wetlands along an urban land-use gradient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis presents the results of a study on the effect of habitat condition and water quality on plankton communities across an urban land-use gradient in the Lake Ontario coastal wetlands: Frenchman???s Bay, Lynde Marsh, McLaughlin Bay, and Bowmanville Marsh over two years (2018-2019). One of the study wetlands (McLaughlin Bay) was assessed over three years (2017-2019) for its suitability as a candidate wetland for biomanipulation restoration. I found water quality was generally not degraded along the urban gradient as expected. Nutrient rich waters and high chloride concentrations were determined to be important drivers of decreased diversity and higher algal biomass dominated by cyanobacteria. In my assessment of McLaughlin Bay, I found that due to the nutrient- and chloride-rich conditions, the plankton community was dominated by inedible algal communities, and small zooplankton taxa. These results do not support applying biomanipulation as a restoration approach in McLaughlin Bay at this time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".