Caractérisation des conditons de culture propices à l'ail des bois en système agroforestier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’ail des bois (Allium tricoccum) est une éphémère printanière prisée par les consommateurs. La récolte abusive a mené à la disparition de plusieurs populations au Québec. La culture sous couvert forestier pourrait permettre une exploitation durable de cette espèce vulnérable. Nos travaux ont montré que la plantation sous une voûte forestière à fermeture tardive favorise la croissance de l’ail des bois, qui retarde alors sa sénescence et s’acclimate à une plus grande disponibilité de lumière. Une faible densité de plantation favorise la croissance et la reproduction individuelle, mais se traduit par un rendement plus faible par surface cultivée. La récolte d’une partie des bulbes en populations naturelles denses stimule légèrement la croissance post-récolte. La récolte des feuilles n’a pas d’impact sur la survie, mais l’effectuer tardivement et ne récolter qu’une feuille sur deux favorisent la régénération des plants. Ces résultats permettront d’améliorer le rendement de cultures d’ail des bois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".