MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045921186

Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 andtrends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindnessin relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis forthe Global Burden of Disease Study

2020· article· en· W7045921186 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical SciencesNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAdigrat UniversityMoorfields Eye CharityUniversiti Sultan Zainal AbidinUniversity of ThessalyWolkite UniversityNational Center of Neurology and PsychiatryHaramaya UniversityUniversidade do MinhoUniversity of GondarMahatma Gandhi UniversityUniversidade de São PauloWuhan UniversityImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoXiamen UniversityBahir Dar UniversityYork UniversityBabol University of Medical SciencesResearch Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesUniversidad Autónoma de SinaloaUniversity of WaterlooNational Institutes of HealthAnglia Ruskin UniversityTehran University of Medical Sciences and Health ServicesUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeResearch to Prevent BlindnessSeoul National University HospitalMinistry of Health and Medical EducationIndian Council of Medical ResearchUniversity College LondonBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungBrien Holden Vision InstituteNational Eye InstituteNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanTrường Đại học Nguyễn Tất ThànhShahroud University of Medical SciencesMedical Research CouncilUniversity of CalcuttaDuke-NUS Medical SchoolFred Hollows FoundationInternational Glaucoma AssociationAristotle University of ThessalonikiMiddlesex UniversityShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesMassachusetts Eye and EarSecretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e InnovaciónSeoul National UniversityUniversidade do PortoSingapore Eye Research InstituteMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustUnited Arab Emirates UniversityQueen's UniversityHarvard UniversityĐại học Quốc gia Hà NộiPublic Health Foundation of IndiaUniverzita Karlova v PrazeIran University of Medical SciencesAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsVisual impairmentBlindnessVisual acuityDiseaseMacular degenerationLow visionBurden of diseaseVision disorder
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)→Same topicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research→French-language works237,207→