MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045932911

Characterizing the Association Between Asthma, and COVID-19 severity

2023· dissertation· en· W7045932911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaPoisson regressionConfoundingAsymptomaticIntubationRetrospective cohort studyEmergency departmentCohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite heterogeneity in outcomes in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, few studies have investigated the risks of developing respiratory failure and death in COVID-19 patients with pre-existing asthma. This study evaluated the impact of asthma on patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) registry. CCEDRRN collected data from consecutive patients presenting to one of 52 participating emergency departments being tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2). We included patients from March 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. Those who were ≥18 years and testing positive for SARS CoV-2 were considered for inclusion. We excluded those who were below the age of 18 and asymptomatic patients. The primary outcome of interest was a composite of intubation or death in the hospital and the secondary outcome is severe COVID-19 as defined by the WHO. Multivariable modified Poisson regression was used to assess the association between asthma and the composite outcome while adjusting for possible confounding variables, including inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use. RESULTS: There were 38,139 patients who met the study inclusion criteria. Among these 2,826 patients had asthma (7.41%). We found no evidence to suggest an association between asthma and intubation or death in the hospital (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.1). Patients who were 80+ years were the highest risk age group developing the primary outcome (RR: 10.54; 95% CI: 7.01, 15.85) compared with the reference group 18-29 years. ICS had a higher risk of developing the primary outcome compared to non-ICS users (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.25). CONCLUSION: No evidence was found to suggest that asthma is associated with death or intubation in the hospital or the development of severe COVID-19 among emergency department patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→