MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045944567

Clima organizacional y desempeño laboral en los profesionales tecnólogos médicos del hospital San Isidro Labrador- EsSalud Lima, 2018

2024· dissertation· es· W7045944567 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2024
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Cronbach's alphaJob satisfactionOrganizational behavior
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo de investigación titulada: “Clima Organizacional y Desempeño
Laboral en los profesionales Tecnólogos Médicos Del Hospital San Isidro Labrador-
Essalud, Lima, 2018”. Siendo el objetivo general: Determinar relación entre el clima
organizacional y desempeño laboral en los profesionales tecnólogos médicos.
El tipo de investigación es sustantiva y el diseño de la investigación es no
experimental de nivel correlacional y de enfoque cuantitativo. La técnica que se
utilizó es la encuesta y los instrumentos de recolección de datos fueron dos
cuestionarios ya validados por otros autores y aplicados a los Tecnólogos Médicos
de dicha institución. Para la validez de los instrumentos se utilizó el juicio de expertos
y el alfa de Cronbach que salió muy alta en ambas variables: 0.936 para la variable
clima organizacional y 0.913 para la variable del desempeño laboral.
En la presente investigación se concluyó que existe relación directa y
significativa entre el Clima Organizacional y el Desempeño Laboral del Personal
asistencial de los tecnólogos médicos. Lo que se demuestra con el estadístico de
Spearman (sig. bilateral = .000 < 0.05; Rho = .805**), el nivel de relación es
moderada directa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1390.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207