MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7046050487

A comparison of laboratory and field resistance to macrocyclic lactones in Haemonchus contortus /

2004· dissertation· en· W7046050487 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaemonchus contortusAnthelminticMoxidectinPyrosequencingStrain (injury)Drug resistanceIvermectinParasite hosting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sustainable parasite control in livestock depends on anthelmintic drugs. The nematode Haemonchus contortus, the most important intestinal parasite of sheep and goats has developed resistance to all classes of anthelmintics including moxidectin, the most potent of the macrocyclic lactones. Pyrosequencing was used to screen H. contortus laboratory and field strains for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with resistance in three genes, and determine their involvement in field resistance to macrocyclic lactones. Specific SNPs increased in frequency in ivermectin/moxidectin laboratory selected strains for all three genes. These did not protect a resistant field strain from a field dose of ivermectin and were not the major mechanism of resistance in the field strain. A gamma-aminobutyric acid chloride receptor SNP may be a potential marker for moxidectin resistance in the field. This study indicates results obtained from laboratory strains selected with sub-therapeutic doses of drug may not reflect the situation in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→