Consommation d’alcool à l’adolescence : les parents doivent mettre des règles… et pas seulement discuter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lorsque vient le temps de parler de consommation d'alcool avec leur adolescent ou leur adolescente, bien des parents ne savent trop sur quel pied danser.Officiellement, l'âge minimal pour consommer de l'alcool est de dix-huit ans au Québec.Bien que sa consommation chez les jeunes ait diminué, plus de 80 % d'entre eux boivent de l'alcool avant l'âge de 17 ans.De nombreux pays ont instauré des lois afin d'interdire la consommation et la vente d'alcool auprès des mineurs afin d'éviter les effets néfastes de l'alcool sur leur cerveau en développement.Ces lois ne suffisent cependant pas à en réduire la consommation.Aussi, le rôle des parents pourrait être déterminant.Alors quoi dire ?Quoi faire ?Pour réduire la consommation d'alcool chez les jeunes, il vaut mieux compter sur les règles parentales, plutôt que sur des discussions quotidiennes.(Shutterstock) Consommation d'alcool à l'adolescence : les parents doivent mettre des règles… et pas seulement discuter
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".