Complications suivant l'admission à l'hôpital pour un traumatisme craniocérébral : une étude de cohorte rétrospective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les complications hospitalières potentiellement liées aux soins chez les patients avec un traumatisme craniocérébral (TCC) sont peu connues. Notre étude de cohorte rétrospective s’intéressait à l’incidence et aux déterminants de ces complications ainsi qu’à leur influence sur la mortalité et la durée de séjour à l’hôpital. Notre population d’étude comprenait les adultes (≥16 ans) admis entre 2007 et 2012 pour un TCC dans un des centres hospitaliers du système de traumatologie du Québec. Le taux d’incidence des complications neurologiques et non neurologiques était respectivement de 35 et 375 par 1000 admissions. Les déterminants reliés au traitement expliquaient 60,3% et 51,2% de la variance dans le risque de complications neurologiques et non-neurologiques respectivement. Les complications neurologiques ont augmenté de 85% la cote de mortalité et 60% la moyenne de la durée de séjour. Les complications non-neurologiques augmentaient de 53% la cote de mortalité et 124% la durée de séjour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".