MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046093540

Central Arctic Lithostratigraphy: Implication for Sediment Transport and Paleoceanography

2012· article· en· W7046093540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bioresource Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterglacialGlacial periodSedimentary depositional environmentIsopach mapArcticSedimentLithology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple cores from the Arctic were analyzed by XRF methods to determine the western Arctic lithostratigraphy as expressed in its geochemistry. In general, glacial and interglacial events have distinctly different chemistry. During glacial events, the sediments have elevated Ti, Fe, Rb, and Zr concentrations and depressed Sr and Mn concentrations. The opposite is true of the brown layers, where Ti, Fe, Rb and Zr are lower with higher levels of Mn and Sr. These data indicate that there are 18 chemically unique lithologic units (LUs) that exist among MIS-1 to MIS-16 age sediments. Isopach maps indicate two general depositional patterns appear to have existed during the late Quaternary. The first pattern is defined as a glacial depositional pattern based on sediment thicknesses present in Clark et al. (1980) SLUs F, H, J, and L. This pattern has the thickest deposits located on parts of the Northwind-Alpha Ridges as well as within the Makarov Basin. The second pattern is associated with interglacial deposits and is based on sediment thicknesses present in SLUs G, I, and K. The interglacial pattern is characterized by much thinner deposits especially for the central Arctic region. Based on the isopach sediment patterns, the potential source areas of the sediments deposited during the glacial and interglacial periods are slightly different. During glacial stages, a strong Canadian source area is suggested. During interglacial stages a Canadian source area exists for deposits in the Canadian Basin, and a potential mixture of Canadian and Russian source areas for sediments located along the Trans-Polar Drift between the Mendeleev-Lomonosov Ridges. Stratigraphic correlations indicate that the western Arctic, central Lomonosov Ridge, and eastern Arctic are geochemically different suggesting different sources for each area. Analysis of the coarse ice-rafted fraction (>250 μm) from strata associated with MIS-16 (LU-17) indicates a Canadian source for the carbonate grains in this unit. However, statistical analysis of these grains in four cores supports the existence of a modified Beaufort Gyre circulation system existed during this period, similar to that identified by Bischof and Darby (1997).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it