Constructing heritage in the global age : the convergence of patrimony and media in\n cultural tourism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2010.; Includes bibliographical\n references.; Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. The creation of cultural messages\n previously was relegated to the sphere of national patrimonial producers. However, this thesis\n departs from prior scholarship by focusing on the integral role of non-government mediated\n environments in cultural construction. These mediated environments have significant\n implications for the tourist's perceptions of the perceived authenticity, commodification, and\n homogenization of the tourism product.; Cultural construction marks most aspects of modern\n life. It requires a selective narrative formation that results in a simplified, easily\n consumable message. This practice is especially pronounced in the field of cultural tourism.\n As elements are included and excluded, how much of what is referred to as\n "culture" is inherent to or representative of places? Further examination\n reveals that the construction of heritage, culture, and place are influenced both by\n government institutions and user-generated participatory models.; In particular, this thesis\n will study the combined effects of government institutional intervention and mediated\n environments on four case studies: Istanbul, Turkey- European Capital of Culture Program;\n Spain- El Camino de Santiago de Compostela; Thailand- Culinary Tourism; and British Columbia,\n Canada- Indigenous Tourism. In each of these cases, the effects on the authenticity,\n commodification, and homogenization of the final tourism product will be\n examined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it