Controlling the Growth of Extremely Halophilic Bacteria on Brine Cured Cattle Hides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Six commercially available brine raceway bactericides were tested for their ability to prevent the growth of extremely halophilic bacteria isolated from hides that were brine cured in either the US or Canada. These products were used at their recommended raceway doses and at two times and four times that amount. The active ingredients of the commercially available bactericides were: naphthalene and 1-2 dichlorobenzene (Bactericide A), trichloro-S-triazinetrione and sodium sulphate (Bactericide B), sodium bisulfite and acetic acid (Bactericide C), alkyl phenol ethoxylate and potassium dimethyl dithrocarbonate (Bactericide D), 2(thiocyanomethylthio) benzothiazole and methylene bis (thiocyanate) (Bactericide E), sodium-ortho-phenylphenate and ortho-benzyl-para-chlorophenol (Bactericide F). Bactericides A, B and E were found to be effective in preventing growth of the extremely halophilic bacteria tested. Bactericides C, D and F were found to be ineffective at the concentrations tested. All of the extremely halophilic isolates used in this experiments showed positive gelatinase activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".