Community Development and Pacific Wellbeing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pacific social work thought-leaders, activists, practitioners, policy-makers and researchers have been invited to talanoa on three critical themes for Pacific social work. peakers: 9am - 10am: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? ENCOURAGING COLLABORATIONS TO ENACT PACIFIC SOCIAL WORK ACROSS OCEANIA @University of Sydney Professor Jioji Ravulo (Chair of Social Work and Policy Studies, University of Sydney) 11am - 12pm PACIFIC APPROACHES IN CHILD & FAMILY PRACTICE Assoc Prof Tracie Mafile’o (School of Social Work, Massey University), Tuaopepe Lucia Kasiano (Team Manager Family and Community Service, Taeaomanino Trust) & Judy Matai’a (Chief Executive Officer, Anglican Trust for Women and Children) 2pm - 3pm ENACTING ANTI-RACISM WITHIN AOTEAROA NZ SOCIAL WOR SYSTEMS Assoc Prof Yvonne Crichton-Hill (Head of Department – Social Work, University of Canterbury), Jean Mitaera (Chief Advisor Pacific, Whitirea and WELTEC), Tu'u'u Apulu Mary Autagavaia (Consultant) & William Pua (Social Work Team Leader, Fonua Ola) 4:30pm - 5:30pm COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PACIFIC WELLBEING Dr Analosa Veukiso-Ulugia (Research Fellow, Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland), Emeline Afeaki-Mafile’o (Director, Affirming Works), Kristina Sofele (National Manager, People and Capability, Vaka Tautua) & Sally Dalhousie (Chief Operating Officer, The Fono) 5:30pm - 6:00pm WHAT WE GATHER FROM OUR TALANOA AND HOW WE MOVE FORWARD TOGETHER Assoc Prof Yvonne Crichton-Hill (Head of Department – Social Work, University of Canterbury), Assoc Prof Tracie Mafile’o (School of Social Work, Massey University), Professor Jioji Ravulo (Chair of Social Work and Policy Studies, University of Sydney) & Dr Analosa Veukiso-Ulugia (Research Fellow, Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland) Pacific social work thought-leaders, activists, practitioners, policy-makers and researchers have been invited to talanoa on three critical themes for Pacific social work. Pacific social work has been defined as: “Centring Pacific-Indigenous ways of knowing and doing, being and becoming for community, family and individual wellbeing whilst counteracting structural, cultural and personal oppressions within Oceania and throughout the diaspora.” (Ravulo, J., Mafileʼo, T., & Yeates, D. B. (2019). Pacific social work: Navigating practice, policy and research (First Edition ed.): Routledge)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.024 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".