MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046164460

Comparison of two different nursing interventions for knee osteoarthritis patients in the community in northern Thailand

2012· other· en· W7046164460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicScientific Research and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisPsychological interventionRepeated measures designIntervention (counseling)Quality of life (healthcare)Patient satisfactionKnee arthritisNursing Interventions ClassificationHealth care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic disease that leads to knee pain, stiffness and limited physical function. A multi-faceted treatment composed of medication management, exercise, health education, and weight control is identified as effective for the reduction of knee pain and increased physical function. This quasi-experimental study undertaken in rural Thailand had an interrupted time-series design and examined whether a multi-faceted intervention delivered by nurse practitioners resulted in improved health status regarding knee OA symptom, quality of life and satisfaction with nursing care and reduced medication usage compared to standard treatment. There were 108 participants (58 experimental, 58 control) who completed the study. The multi-faceted intervention included education, group exercise, weight loss, and medication management delivered over aI2-week period. Four time points were used across the study (weeks 1 and 4 pre-intervention and 16 and 20 post-intervention) to collect data including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Self-Form 36 (SF-36), Leeds Satisfaction Questionnaires (LSQ) and medication usage diary. Analysis of variance and non-parametric analyses were used to examine differences across time and t-tests and mean change differences were used to examine the group differences pre- and post- intervention. The experimental group reported significant mean change increase in LSQ score and a mean change decrease in medication usage than the control group post-intervention. This supported the hypotheses that the multi-faceted intervention delivered by nurse practitioners would result in greater satisfaction with nursing care and a reduction in medication usage than standard treatment among patients with knee OA. There were no significant mean change differences in the WOMAC and SF-36 scores between the groups. However, both groups reported improvement in WOMAC and SF-36 scores so it is probable that both treatments helped to maintain health status and quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it