MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046191189

Consumers’ perception of amaranth in Mexico: A traditional food with characteristics of functional foods

2019· other· en· W7046191189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Académica (Acta Académica) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLife expectancyPopulationPerceptionNutrition transitionQuality (philosophy)OverweightFood productsObesity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the market of functional foods has grown mainly in developed countries. The Asian-Pacific region, the USA, Canada and Europe consume 78 per cent of total sales (Vicentini et al., 2016). This growth is due to demographic changes as the increase of life expectancy that generates consumers more aware of their health, incorporating in their diets new foods that promise to improve and prolong their quality of life (Vecchio et al., 2016). This phenomenon has influenced other emergent markets like Mexico and Brazil that are the highest consumers of functional foods in Latina America (Vicentini et al., 2016). In Mexico as in other countries, the economic development, and demographic and socio-cultural changes have also promoted modification of lifestyles in different social strata of the population (Espinoza-Ortega et al., 2016). A negative effect of these changes is reflected in the high incidence of diabetes (9.5 per cent) and high overweight in more than 70 per cent of adults (INSP, 2016). From this, Mexican consumers seem to be willing to incorporate foods

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Académica (Acta Académica)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207