MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7046296586

Comportements sexuels problématiques d'enfants pris en charge par les centres jeunesse facteurs associés

2008· other· fr· W7046296586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2008
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoison controlSexual abuseContext (archaeology)Family life
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude explore les facteurs associés aux comportements sexuels problématiques (CSP) dirigés vers soi et dirigés vers les autres. L'échantillon utilisé est composé de 187 enfants de 6 à 11 ans pris en charge par quatre Centres jeunesse du Québec (Pauzé, Toupin, Déry, Mercier & Joly, 2004). Les résultats démontrent que le tempérament de l'enfant, la violence rapportée dans la famille au cours des 12 derniers mois et le fait que l'enfant ait déjà vécu une agression sexuelle sont associés aux CSP dirigés vers soi et dirigé vers les autres. De plus, la détresse psychologique des parents est associée aux CSP dirigés vers les autres, alors qu'un niveau plus élevé d'agression physique et émotionnelle dans l'enfance du parent est associé au CSP dirigés vers soi. Ces résultats appuient en partie certaines théories explicatives des CSP chez les enfants. Ils questionnent également la pertinence de distinguer les CSP dirigés vers soi et dirigés vers les autres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→