Coach education in the French speaking part of Belgium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En octobre 2004, un colloque était organisé à Liège et portait sur la thématique "L'entraînement et la formation sportive: regards croisés des praticiens et des chercheurs". A l'issue d'une table ronde ayant rassemblé six entraîneurs renommés, le conférencier principal, le Prof. Trudel de l'Université d'Ottawa posait la question de savoir quelle formation les entraîneurs sportifs devraient idéalement recevoir. L'intérêt suscité par cette thématique, tant auprès des intervenants que des participants, nous a incités à solliciter un subside auprès de la Communauté française pour la réalisation d'une étude pilote destinée à tester une méthodologie de recherche visant à collecter des informations pertinentes sur la formation des entraîneurs francophones belges. ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".