The cultural diversification of the Scottish teaching profession: how necessary is it?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last two decades in most parts of the world, the nature of teachers' work and the knowledge they require has undergone enormous change. In part, these changes have occurred in response to unprecedented levels of global mobility. Culturally homogenous classrooms have become rare in most places in Britain, Europe and elsewhere, such as the USA, Canada and Australia (OECD, 2011). Of particular significance is the rapid rate of demographic change in some countries where there has been recent and relative cultural homogeneity, such as Iceland (OECD, 2013) and Ireland. for example (Government of Ireland 2012). Countries including the USA. Canada and Australia, sometimes referred to as 'classical immigration countries' or 'traditional immigration countries' (Dustmann, Frattini, & Lanrora 2011), have experienced increased cultural diversity in specific geographical areas and regions in response to government resettlement policies (e.g., Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection 2014). Additionally, although not due to global trends in immigration, the cultural and linguistic diversity of countries such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States of America, includes the diverse cultures and languages of Aboriginal and First Nations populations. Despite the increased cultural and linguistic diversity of student populations, in Scotland, like the rest of the UK, the majority of teachers are white and monolingual (The Scottish Government. 2011; Department for Education, 2012). Increasingly, the lack of ethnic diversity within teacher populations worldwide is seen as problematic by researchers and policy makers in general, who have called for some time for the cultural and racial diversification of the profession. One of the reasons underpinning such calls is the benefit to culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) pupils. An increasing body of research suggests ethnik and racial minority teachers have important insights about the pupils with whom they share cultural minority status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".