Dejeneratif Menisküs Yırtığına Bağlı Parsiyel Menisektomi Sonrası Kuvvet Duyusu, Fonksiyonel Performans, Yaşam Kalitesi, Aktivite Düzeyi ve Kinezyofobi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the force sense of knee joint, functional performance, quality of life, activity level and kinesiophobia between healthy and patients with degenerative meniscal tear following meniscectomy. Twenty healthy subjects and 20 individuals who underwent meniscectomy within 20-month postoperatively were included in this study. Pain severity of the subjects was assessed with visual analogue scale, range of motion in knee joint assessed with universal goniometer, maximal voluntary isometric muscle strength (MVIMS) of M. Ouadriceps femoris and force sense assessed with a biofeedback device, functional performance assessed with stair up/down, physical activity level assessed with Tegner Activity Level scale, physical function assessed with Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), quality of life assessed with Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET), kinesiophobia assessed with Brief Fear of Movement Scale. However, range of motion (p=0.002); maximal voluntary isometric muscle strength of M. Quadriceps femoris (p=0,012) and force sense (p=0.001) decreased in the operated leg compared with the non-operated leg. Maximal voluntary isometric muscle strength of M. Quadriceps femoris (p=0.003); force sense (p<0.001); functional performance (p<0.001); physical function (p=0.043) and quality of life (p<0.001) were lower in meniscectomy group compared to healthy peers. Pain severity, range of motion, physical activity level, kinesiophobia scores were also similar in both groups (p>0.05). Considering that functional deficient after partial meniscectomy we suggest that individuals with meniscectomy need detailed assessment programs and rehabilitation programs to support functional recovery after surgery. We suggest that physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs should be established considering deficiencies in muscle strength, proprioception, functional performance, physical function and quality of life following partial meniscectomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".