MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046356778

Continuous tone printing in silicone from CNC milled
\nmatrices

2014· other· en· W7046356778 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTone (literature)Context (archaeology)Digital printingProcess (computing)Relation (database)Impression
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The researchers at the Centre for Fine Print Research (CFPR) have been reappraising 19th Century print processes for the last fifteen years and Hoskins has published on the continuous tone properties of Woodburytype and its relation to other 19thC processes such as photo-ceramics in previous \npapers to the IS&T PICT (1) and EI in 2003 (2). Since the invention of Walter Bentley Woodbury’s ‘Woodburytype process in 1865 (3), it has been possible to autographically print a true continuous tone black and white \nphotographic image. New research at CFPR builds upon previous research to combining 19th Century Photomechanical techniques with digital technology to reappraise the potential of these processes CNC milled relief printing blocks from which casts are taken will enable a physical and tactile surface quality that more closely resembles the \nautographic surface of the Woodburytype and the three colour carbon printing processes. Therefore this latest research aims to explore the potential of creating coloured pictorial imagery from a continuous tone relief surface. The specific context for the research is to create a surface \nquality and visual appearance that retains the character of the earlier autographic processes, such as letterpress and screen printing, which are undergoing a revival, This is happening for two reasons, one, for their hand crafted content, and secondly, because they create a physical and \ntactile surface that has a subjective quality, hard to define using standard testing methodologies. To prove the potential the research team have been using CNC milled \nimages where the height of the relief image is dictated by creating a tone curve and then milling this curve into a series of relief blocks from which the image is cast in a silicone ink. A translucent image is cast from each of the colour matrices and each colour is assembled - one on top of \nanother - resulting is a colour continuous tone print, where colour tone is created by physical depth of colour. \nA number of factors have come together to enable a reappraisal of continuous tone printing. Software is now readily available that will split a photographic image into a bump map image where the Z-axis corresponds to a set of height steps on a tonal step wedge from black to white. This software is easily transcribed to either a DXF for processing in G Code to CNC (Computer Numeric control) in order mill an image. In addition new silicone materials have become more readily available that can be precisely coloured. The aim is to create a digitally initiated, physical tactile surface that retains the qualities of arlier autographic process which is capable of being transferred to a range of substrates and demonstrates the potential for future research into new methods of continuous tone printing. This research is part of a larger parallel research project to investigate the potential of creating a physically printed relief surface that better \nrepresents the autographic mark making requirements of visual artists and designers. \n(1) Thirkell, Paul, Hoskins, Stephen, 2003, A reassessment of past colour collotype printing achievements as a model for current digital, archival printing practice. IS&T SPIE PICS Digital Photography Conference, Rochester New York \n(2) Hoskins, Stephen, Thirkell Paul, 2003 The relevance of 19th Century continuous tone photomechanical printing techniques to digitally generated imagery IS&T SPIE Electronic Imaging Conference, Santa Clara, California \n(3) Nadeau, Luis, Encyclopedia of printing, photographic and \nphotomechanical processes, 1989-1990 Atelier Luis Nadeau, Canada. ISBN 0969084153

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207